Skip to content

Chartered Accountants · Lalitpur, Nepal

← All insights

Advisory Insight

Why credit committees reject feasibility studies — and how to fix yours

Advisory Desk · ·

Credit committees rarely reject projects in the first reading. They reject documents they cannot test. The difference between a financed project and a rejected one is usually traceable to five omissions.

1. Assumptions without sources

Every price, volume and growth rate needs a citation: a contract, a quotation, a published series. Unsourced assumptions are read as optimism.

2. One scenario, no sensitivity

A single base case tells the committee nothing about downside. Show break-even, and show what happens at 80% of your price and volume assumptions.

3. Working capital ignored

Projects fail on cash, not on profit. Debtors days, stock days and creditor days must appear in the funding plan, not just in an appendix.

4. Implementation without owners

A schedule without named responsibilities reads as a wish. Committees fund teams, not timelines.

5. No independent hand on the numbers

A study prepared and signed by the borrower is evidence of intent; a study reviewed by Chartered Accountants is evidence of arithmetic. Banks price the difference.

The committee is not asking whether your project is good. It is asking whether your numbers survive contact with reality.

Prepared by

Advisory Desk · Baral & K.C. Associates

This note is general guidance and not advice on your specific facts. Rates, thresholds and deadlines change; confirm the current position before acting.

Apply it to your facts

Discuss what this means for you.

General notes cannot see your ledger. A partner can — usually within one business day.